🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an observance that started out as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a corporate feel, growing to encompass functions where Black people are compensated to talk to white audiences about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since that time, giving reduced attention to the accounts of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the celebration is commemorated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels emboldened to say that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the European continent as a entirety.

In the America, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the state. A effort to scrub Black history and legacy from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's early administrative commands aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration represents how little it can be effective if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized celebrations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the situation of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. A university professor, a professor at an educational institution, put it best when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just discontinue things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an framework that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) included in educational programs. It would also be a period that does not avoid governmental matters, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who celebrate it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and alertness to “microaggressions”, but faced with the threats that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and responsive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.